My best book for the month of May is Jennifer Robson's The Gown. The Gown is the story of how Queen Elizabeth II's wedding dress was designed and sewn. While it had a slow start this book was mesmerizing once it got started. The excitement that was in the air in Britain when Elizabeth's engagement to Phillip was announced was evident to the reader. Coming out of the awful era of WWII the news of this wedding excited people, probably because it was good news. Any good news may have done the trick but this was Elizabeth and Phillips's news. The story primarily follows two embroiderers who worked on the gown. There was a parallel plot from the current era that was interesting but not as compelling. It was used, though, to help tell the story of the embroiderers. Until I read this book I was not aware that Elizabeth's dress was packed full of embroidery. I had seen pictures of her dress in the past and had seen rows of something in the dress but never would have guessed that it was silk embroidery. I would love to see it now in the museum that it is housed in. I understand, however, that the embroidery did not stand up to time as the silk material it was sewn to was not the best for having embroidery added to it. However, the Queen's mother insisted on a particular type of silk for the dress.
Book reviews of mysteries, historical fiction and graphic novels with a smattering of non-fiction books.
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Saturday, May 25, 2019
Jane
Jane is a modern day version of Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre told in a graphic novel format. The writer has changed Bronte's storyline but the two main characters Jane and her love Rochester are present.
The book summary from the back cover blurb reads: "Growing up in an unhappy family in a small New England town, Jane dreamed of escaping to New York City to study art and live a life of independent adventure. Soon after arriving, she takes a job as a nanny for a mysterious, powerful businessman, Rochester, and his lovable but lonely daughter Adele, in a lavish apartment filled with unsettling secrets. Jane soon finds herself drawn into a world of intrigue, danger and romance that takes her far beyond her childhood dreams."
This is a delightful, fast paced read. However, if you're looking for Jane Eyre in a comic you will be disappointed. The author has changed the plot significantly. I think it is a cute book but the advertisement of the book as a modern day Jane Eyre is deceptive. The only thing it has in common with the old classic is Jane's family background and that she loves a man named Rochester.
The artwork is beautiful. Ramon Perez did the illustrations and Irma Kniivila did the coloring with her watercolor washes. The pages are primarily blue with gold highlights but many are orange with gold highlights or olive green with the gold. The effects are striking. I think the art makes this book. While it has interesting characters and a good plot, without these drawings I don't think the book would be as engaging.
I enjoyed this book immensely. It's light charm was a perfect choice for the park on the first warm, sunny day of the season that I chose to read it on.
5 out of 5 stars.
The book summary from the back cover blurb reads: "Growing up in an unhappy family in a small New England town, Jane dreamed of escaping to New York City to study art and live a life of independent adventure. Soon after arriving, she takes a job as a nanny for a mysterious, powerful businessman, Rochester, and his lovable but lonely daughter Adele, in a lavish apartment filled with unsettling secrets. Jane soon finds herself drawn into a world of intrigue, danger and romance that takes her far beyond her childhood dreams."
This is a delightful, fast paced read. However, if you're looking for Jane Eyre in a comic you will be disappointed. The author has changed the plot significantly. I think it is a cute book but the advertisement of the book as a modern day Jane Eyre is deceptive. The only thing it has in common with the old classic is Jane's family background and that she loves a man named Rochester.
The artwork is beautiful. Ramon Perez did the illustrations and Irma Kniivila did the coloring with her watercolor washes. The pages are primarily blue with gold highlights but many are orange with gold highlights or olive green with the gold. The effects are striking. I think the art makes this book. While it has interesting characters and a good plot, without these drawings I don't think the book would be as engaging.
I enjoyed this book immensely. It's light charm was a perfect choice for the park on the first warm, sunny day of the season that I chose to read it on.
5 out of 5 stars.
Where We Live
Where We Live is an anthology of stories of the 2017 Las Vegas music concert mass shooting told in a graphic novel format. The shooting resulted in 58 deaths and injured more than 500 people. Where We Live is an unusual graphic novel as it has both fictionalized cartoons and cartoons from eyewitnesses. Several themes are discussed such as gun control, a compassionate society, the stigma of mental health, and how communities persevere after a tragedy.
All of the 90 cartoonists used bold, vivid colors in their comic strips which was what initially made me interested in the book at my local bookstore. After reading the back cover blurb describing the book I decided that I had to buy it.
After beginning to read, I had to put the book down several times because the darkness of the stories was overwhelming. There were many eyewitness accounts in the book's 331 pages. They were riveting but the fear and grief expressed in them consumed my spirit because the darkness in each of the stories never seemed to end for me while I was reading. Each comic strip exuded so much emotion that it was hard to handle. One or two short essays on the beginnings of guns in the U. S. is included and I learned a few facts from them. However, even the essays exuded negative emotions.
Where We Live is a difficult read. I can understand why the editor, Will Dennis, included all of these comic strips in the book. He is from Las Vegas. If you are from Las Vegas, the fear and grief is one you share with the cartoonists. For me, who doesn't live there, it seemed to be over kill. While I understand this is an anthology of comic strips its impact on me was one of horror, too much horror to be affected by the social commentary. It meant nothing to me. All I felt was the fear of the people who were present at the shooting. I do not know if that was the editor's intention or whether this book was written for the people of Las Vegas.
4 out of 5 stars.
All of the 90 cartoonists used bold, vivid colors in their comic strips which was what initially made me interested in the book at my local bookstore. After reading the back cover blurb describing the book I decided that I had to buy it.
After beginning to read, I had to put the book down several times because the darkness of the stories was overwhelming. There were many eyewitness accounts in the book's 331 pages. They were riveting but the fear and grief expressed in them consumed my spirit because the darkness in each of the stories never seemed to end for me while I was reading. Each comic strip exuded so much emotion that it was hard to handle. One or two short essays on the beginnings of guns in the U. S. is included and I learned a few facts from them. However, even the essays exuded negative emotions.
Where We Live is a difficult read. I can understand why the editor, Will Dennis, included all of these comic strips in the book. He is from Las Vegas. If you are from Las Vegas, the fear and grief is one you share with the cartoonists. For me, who doesn't live there, it seemed to be over kill. While I understand this is an anthology of comic strips its impact on me was one of horror, too much horror to be affected by the social commentary. It meant nothing to me. All I felt was the fear of the people who were present at the shooting. I do not know if that was the editor's intention or whether this book was written for the people of Las Vegas.
4 out of 5 stars.
Thursday, May 23, 2019
The Mueller Report
I was at Barnes and Noble earlier in the week and found The Mueller Report for sale in two formats. One was published by the Washington Post newspaper and the other one was published by Skyhorse Publishing.
There are slight differences between the two books. Both contain the full redacted version of the report. How that redaction is shown differs in each book.
The Washington Post version has articles in the beginning of the book as well as the indictments of the people who were indicted by the Mueller Team in the back of the book. The other version only has an article by attorney Alan Dershowitz in the front of the book. The redactions in the Skyhorse version are shown only with [redaction] in between sentences. The Post version has page after page of blackened out paragraphs for the redactions. This makes the redactions seem more sinister than what we have been told they are about, i.e., national security matters.
The Mueller Report has citations on each page showing where information came from. For example, information may have come from an interview with Donald Trump, Jr. on a particular date. In the Post version of the Report the citations are on each page. The Skyhorse version has them all at the back of the book. Clearly, the Post version is a better read because of the placement of these citations. Both books have Attorney General William Barr's letter to Congress wherein he summarized the Report.
Which version should you choose? I did not want to be influenced by any articles before reading the actual report itself so I didn't read them initially. I wanted to form my own beliefs. If you have watched cable news then you know that Alan Dershowitz loves Trump and the Washington Post doesn't. If you lean right or left politically you may want to make your choice that way. The Washington Post version is easier to understand because the citations from where information came from are on the same page where the information is stated. The Post version is much larger but is only $3 more expensive.
I am not going to state what I believe about the Report, Barr's summary or the articles. My only recommendation is that you read the Mueller Report itself before reading the Barr summary or any articles. Form your own conclusions before reading about someone else's conclusions. Whichever one you choose it will be a collector's item in decades to come. My copies are already on the bookshelf next to The Pentagon Papers.
There are slight differences between the two books. Both contain the full redacted version of the report. How that redaction is shown differs in each book.
The Washington Post version has articles in the beginning of the book as well as the indictments of the people who were indicted by the Mueller Team in the back of the book. The other version only has an article by attorney Alan Dershowitz in the front of the book. The redactions in the Skyhorse version are shown only with [redaction] in between sentences. The Post version has page after page of blackened out paragraphs for the redactions. This makes the redactions seem more sinister than what we have been told they are about, i.e., national security matters.
The Mueller Report has citations on each page showing where information came from. For example, information may have come from an interview with Donald Trump, Jr. on a particular date. In the Post version of the Report the citations are on each page. The Skyhorse version has them all at the back of the book. Clearly, the Post version is a better read because of the placement of these citations. Both books have Attorney General William Barr's letter to Congress wherein he summarized the Report.
Which version should you choose? I did not want to be influenced by any articles before reading the actual report itself so I didn't read them initially. I wanted to form my own beliefs. If you have watched cable news then you know that Alan Dershowitz loves Trump and the Washington Post doesn't. If you lean right or left politically you may want to make your choice that way. The Washington Post version is easier to understand because the citations from where information came from are on the same page where the information is stated. The Post version is much larger but is only $3 more expensive.
I am not going to state what I believe about the Report, Barr's summary or the articles. My only recommendation is that you read the Mueller Report itself before reading the Barr summary or any articles. Form your own conclusions before reading about someone else's conclusions. Whichever one you choose it will be a collector's item in decades to come. My copies are already on the bookshelf next to The Pentagon Papers.
Monday, May 13, 2019
The Enemies of Versailles
The Enemies of Versailles is the final book in the salacious Mistresses of Versailles trilogy by Sally Christie. Louis XV has spent a few years getting to know his unmarried daughters since his last mistress died, the Marquise de Pompadour. He has not had much interest in women for four years. He was devastated by the death of the Marquise. However, four years and 100+ pages later he meets thirty year old Jeanne Becu, later known as Madame du Barry, and falls in love.
This love affair is different from Louis' earlier mistresses. I am assuming it is due to him now being 60 years old. He has a hard time getting her installed at Versailles because a woman already presented at Court must present her. No one will. Jeanne grew up in a brothel and worked as a prostitute herself later in life. The aristocracy will not accept her as the King's mistress. I see him as not trying that hard to help her since he gets the opportunity to sleep with her daily anyway. He does not seem as enamored with her as he was with his earlier mistresses or she would have had a bedroom next to his at Versailles in no time. Eventually she gets a home an hour outside of Versailles, with travel time Louis would not have been able to stand with his prior mistresses. He was too eager for them.
There is nothing steamy in this novel as there was in the first two novels of the trilogy. It is all about Court intrigue with the spinster daughters plotting silliness and the grandson, Louis XVI, not being able to consummate his marriage. The book was not interesting. I expected to devour it as I had with the first two books but it took me two weeks to read it. What a disappointment!
The virginity of the daughters and the dauphine, Marie Antoinette, was written in a more titillating manner than the sections where Jeanne was with Louis in the bedroom. I thought it odd at first but then realized that these women were the enemies of Jeanne and perhaps the book was really about them, the enemies of Versailles. In a trilogy titled the Mistress of Versailles you would expect the books to be about the mistresses but maybe I got this one wrong. There were, in fact, more scenes written about Louis' family than about his mistress. It all ended with the French Revolution and the guillotine which I also thought was odd since the trilogy was about Louis XV.
This was a most unsatisfying end to the trilogy. It might be because the truth about Louis' last relationship was boring and the author didn't have much to work with but it just didn't sizzle.
3 out of 5 stars.
This love affair is different from Louis' earlier mistresses. I am assuming it is due to him now being 60 years old. He has a hard time getting her installed at Versailles because a woman already presented at Court must present her. No one will. Jeanne grew up in a brothel and worked as a prostitute herself later in life. The aristocracy will not accept her as the King's mistress. I see him as not trying that hard to help her since he gets the opportunity to sleep with her daily anyway. He does not seem as enamored with her as he was with his earlier mistresses or she would have had a bedroom next to his at Versailles in no time. Eventually she gets a home an hour outside of Versailles, with travel time Louis would not have been able to stand with his prior mistresses. He was too eager for them.
There is nothing steamy in this novel as there was in the first two novels of the trilogy. It is all about Court intrigue with the spinster daughters plotting silliness and the grandson, Louis XVI, not being able to consummate his marriage. The book was not interesting. I expected to devour it as I had with the first two books but it took me two weeks to read it. What a disappointment!
The virginity of the daughters and the dauphine, Marie Antoinette, was written in a more titillating manner than the sections where Jeanne was with Louis in the bedroom. I thought it odd at first but then realized that these women were the enemies of Jeanne and perhaps the book was really about them, the enemies of Versailles. In a trilogy titled the Mistress of Versailles you would expect the books to be about the mistresses but maybe I got this one wrong. There were, in fact, more scenes written about Louis' family than about his mistress. It all ended with the French Revolution and the guillotine which I also thought was odd since the trilogy was about Louis XV.
This was a most unsatisfying end to the trilogy. It might be because the truth about Louis' last relationship was boring and the author didn't have much to work with but it just didn't sizzle.
3 out of 5 stars.
Thursday, May 2, 2019
The Gown
I was supposed to receive an advanced review copy of The Gown from the publisher in October, 2018 through the Early Reviewer's Program at Librarything but, sadly, it never arrived in the mail. I took the book out of my local library as soon as it hit the shelves. The Gown is the story of Queen Elizabeth II's wedding gown.
The story begins by introducing the characters who work for Thomas Hartnell, the designer of the wedding gown as well as the introduction of a parallel plot. However, this introduction was 140 pages long. 140 pages out of a 370 page book is a long time to wait before a reader gets to the point of a book, in this case, working on Elizabeth's wedding dress.
The two main characters Ann Hughes, an English girl, and Miriam Dassin, a French immigrant who survived Nazi France, were embroiderers who worked on the wedding dress in 1947. In Toronto in 2016 Heather Mackenzie discovers in a box left to her by her grandmother some embroideries that matched those on Queen Elizabeth's wedding gown. Heather also finds an old photo of her grandmother with the now famous artist Dassin. She travels to London to learn more about her grandmother's past. The story alternates between the 1947 plot and the 2016 plot.
The story had a slow start. Once the characters began working on creating Elizabeth's dress, the book became exciting. The seamstresses and embroiderers were under great pressure to keep the dress's design a secret. Some were used by reporters masquerading as boyfriends in attempts at getting inside information on the gown. Even the parallel plot became more exciting too.
The two main female characters were quite interesting. They were strong women, unusually strong for the era. Miriam was a French Jew who was sent to the Ravensbruck concentration camp in Germany. Within months of her arrival in London she is working on a royal princess's gown. That is an incredible turnaround for a one year period of time. Ann has her own rite of passage but since I don't want to give away any more spoilers, I will leave her story out of my review.
Despite the slow start, this was a wonderful story. The reader could feel the emotional drain of WWII on England before the announcement of Elizabeth's engagement. Her happy announcement catapulted the nation out of its feelings of depression into joy. Perhaps any happy event would have done the trick but it was Elizabeth who got the job done. This begs the question whether her connection with her subjects was strong from this time forward because people remember how they felt during the time of her wedding.
At the conclusion of the story the author interviewed Betty Foster who was one of the four seamstresses who created Elizabeth's gown. This interview gave me goosebumps as it validated the story I just read.
4 out of 5 stars!
The story begins by introducing the characters who work for Thomas Hartnell, the designer of the wedding gown as well as the introduction of a parallel plot. However, this introduction was 140 pages long. 140 pages out of a 370 page book is a long time to wait before a reader gets to the point of a book, in this case, working on Elizabeth's wedding dress.
The two main characters Ann Hughes, an English girl, and Miriam Dassin, a French immigrant who survived Nazi France, were embroiderers who worked on the wedding dress in 1947. In Toronto in 2016 Heather Mackenzie discovers in a box left to her by her grandmother some embroideries that matched those on Queen Elizabeth's wedding gown. Heather also finds an old photo of her grandmother with the now famous artist Dassin. She travels to London to learn more about her grandmother's past. The story alternates between the 1947 plot and the 2016 plot.
The story had a slow start. Once the characters began working on creating Elizabeth's dress, the book became exciting. The seamstresses and embroiderers were under great pressure to keep the dress's design a secret. Some were used by reporters masquerading as boyfriends in attempts at getting inside information on the gown. Even the parallel plot became more exciting too.
The two main female characters were quite interesting. They were strong women, unusually strong for the era. Miriam was a French Jew who was sent to the Ravensbruck concentration camp in Germany. Within months of her arrival in London she is working on a royal princess's gown. That is an incredible turnaround for a one year period of time. Ann has her own rite of passage but since I don't want to give away any more spoilers, I will leave her story out of my review.
Despite the slow start, this was a wonderful story. The reader could feel the emotional drain of WWII on England before the announcement of Elizabeth's engagement. Her happy announcement catapulted the nation out of its feelings of depression into joy. Perhaps any happy event would have done the trick but it was Elizabeth who got the job done. This begs the question whether her connection with her subjects was strong from this time forward because people remember how they felt during the time of her wedding.
At the conclusion of the story the author interviewed Betty Foster who was one of the four seamstresses who created Elizabeth's gown. This interview gave me goosebumps as it validated the story I just read.
4 out of 5 stars!
Wednesday, May 1, 2019
Book of the Month: April
My favorite book for the month of April is Kid Gloves by Lucy Knisley. Kid Gloves is a graphic novel detailing the author's attempts to get pregnant and carry a child to full term.
I am surprised that for 2 months in a row my favorite book was a graphic novel. It just shows how good these adult graphic novels can be. Kid Gloves is Knisley's most serious novel to date. It is autobiographical and while I am not maternal in any sense, I felt Knisley's emotions throughout her experience, from miscarriage through miscarriage to a full pregnancy and a delivery that almost killed her. She showed emotion on every page with her drawings and while she used bright colors I think she was being optimistic by using them.
I enjoyed the book enough to buy it after taking it out of the library. I cannot recommend it to you more highly.
I am surprised that for 2 months in a row my favorite book was a graphic novel. It just shows how good these adult graphic novels can be. Kid Gloves is Knisley's most serious novel to date. It is autobiographical and while I am not maternal in any sense, I felt Knisley's emotions throughout her experience, from miscarriage through miscarriage to a full pregnancy and a delivery that almost killed her. She showed emotion on every page with her drawings and while she used bright colors I think she was being optimistic by using them.
I enjoyed the book enough to buy it after taking it out of the library. I cannot recommend it to you more highly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)